http://b4hntuy3fimfh2227vf4f74emnya7p35i5brtqujs6leqvtclfwvjbqd.onion/doc/czarnikow/Czarnikow%20v.%20Roth,%20Schmidt%20&%20Co.%20(C.A.).html
(C.A.) for an order directing them to state a special case for the opinion of the Court upon questions of law arising in the course of the reference." The Divisional Court (Swift and Acton JJ.), without deciding whether r. 19 was against public policy, held that the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in not giving the buyers an opportunity of having that question decided by the Court, and on that ground they set aside the award.